SpaceX Starlink Launches Squeeze Rivals as Falcon 9 Capacity Gets Booked Through 2029

SpaceX Starlink Launches Squeeze Rivals as Falcon 9 Capacity Gets Booked Through 2029

SpaceX's increasing dominance in the launch sector is not any longer solely the result of its reusable rockets and fast launch schedule. The company is now using more of its own launch capacity on its Starlink satellite network, which is causing problems for other space companies that have hitherto depended on SpaceX to launch their satellites into orbit. This change is especially clear in the rising proportion of Starlink missions launched on the Falcon 9. In 2020, Starlink made up about 54% of the Falcon 9 launch schedule. For the first part of 2026, that figure has increased to around 79%. To put it another way, almost eight out of every 10 Falcon 9 missions are now being employed to launch SpaceX's own Starlink satellites, leaving less room for customers outside the company.

This situation underscores an increasing economic issue in the space industry, namely that access to orbital launch capacity is still limited even though demand for satellite launches is continuing to rise. Over the past few months, no less than seven spacecraft companies have been informed that the Falcon 9 rocket will be fully booked for various types of missions until 2028 or 2029. For firms which have already made substantial investments in the design and construction of their satellites but do not operate their own orbital-class rockets, having to wait for several years before a launch can turn into a serious business risk since delays can lead to higher costs, the postponement of revenue, and a requirement for startups to raise extra capital while their equipment stays on the ground.

The pressure is closely linked to SpaceX's intention to shift from the Falcon 9 to its much larger Starship rocket. Starship is being developed as a fully reusable launch system intended to carry considerably larger payloads and in the end to be operated at a lower cost than Falcon 9. In theory, the shift could eventually greatly increase SpaceX's launch capacity. But in the short term the company's work on Starship, including its testing and operations, might cause Falcon 9 to become a particularly scarce resource for other customers.

Starlink is central to the question of economic calculation. Analysts believe that a single Starlink mission with the Starship could bring in tens of millions of dollars more in revenue for SpaceX than if it had launched a commercial customer's payload. The reason for this is that every extra Starlink satellite increases the size of SpaceX's own network and opens up the possibility of future revenue from the service. For SpaceX, therefore, using a rocket to launch its own satellites involves more than just a launch fee; it is an investment in a business that will be able to generate revenue after the rocket has finished its job.

Starlink's financial significance has already become huge. In 2025 the company earned about $11.4 billion in revenue, whereas SpaceX's activities in the field of space and launches brought in around $4.1 billion. Last year Starlink made up about 60% of SpaceX's total revenue, thus acting as a key part of the company's business. This substantial financial contribution gives SpaceX a strong motive to give priority to its own satellites when launch capacity is limited. Rather than using up the limited rocket capacity to serve an external customer, it can use the same capacity to extend the network which produces ongoing revenue.

This makes a basic distinction between SpaceX and conventional commercial launch companies. While other companies are merely selling access to orbit, SpaceX is also one of the biggest buyers of launches using its own rockets. Owing to its vertically integrated approach, the company is able to build satellites, launch them using its rockets and then run them as part of a service which brings in ongoing revenue. For smaller satellite companies, on the other hand, the same kind of structure can make it harder to get access to orbit since the company which holds a major portion of launch capacity is also competing for that capacity with its own expanding satellite network.

The fact that the American space industry is on such a large scale means that the question is even more important. Since 2000 there has been roughly $50 billion worth of capital investment, more than 500 companies having built spacecraft or been operating satellites in space. Many of these businesses do not possess their own launch vehicles capable of sending payloads into orbit and so have to rely on commercial rocket companies to get their equipment into space. If launch slots become harder to obtain, the results could go beyond simple scheduling difficulties. Companies might have to pay higher financing costs, experience longer development cycles and come under greater pressure to raise enough capital to last until their satellites can start generating revenue.

Falcon 9 has become one of the most important assets in the American space industry thanks to its reusable first-stage booster and SpaceX's high launch frequency. A single Falcon 9 booster has been reused up to 35 times, showing the degree of operational reuse that rivals have been unable to achieve. However, increased reusability has not resulted in a continuous decline in launch prices; the cost of a Falcon 9 launch has risen from about $54 million in 2013 to approximately $74 million at present. For satellite companies which are already having to wait for years, the mix of limited availability and higher launch costs can add another level of financial strain.

The situation could prove especially difficult for young space startups. Although a company may take years and spend millions of dollars developing a satellite, its intended commercial return does not begin to materialise until the spacecraft has been launched and starts operating. Since the launch is delayed, revenue is also delayed while salaries, facility costs, financing charges and other expenses keep on having to be paid. This in turn exacerbates what industry executives refer to as the “valley of death” that young space companies face, especially when they are trying to move from technology development to establishing a sustainable commercial business.

SpaceX's future plans might well increase the demand for launch services. The company has stated that it wants to use Starship to extend the Starlink system and eventually launch as many as one million solar-powered satellites which are to be designed as orbital artificial intelligence data centres. Should that aim materialise on the scale that SpaceX has outlined, its own demand for launch capacity could end up being much greater than it currently is. Every satellite launched as part of such a network would count as another use of SpaceX's own rockets and would be another possible source of future revenue.

The artificial intelligence aspect introduces another economic factor into the strategy. Should orbital data centres become a major market, the opportunity cost of using a launch vehicle for an external customer might become even higher for SpaceX. A rocket carrying a commercial customer's satellite brings in launch revenue, whereas one carrying SpaceX's own infrastructure could help grow a considerably bigger long-term business. This difference could affect how the company distributes its limited launch capacity in the coming years.

The NASA commitments could also take up a major part of Starship's early operational schedule since NASA has entered into a contract with SpaceX for the use of Starship as a lunar lander, with a mission scheduled to take place as early as 2028. The programme includes dozens of in-space refuelling flights and tests of Starship. Moreover, SpaceX has already secured some commercial customers for Starship. Yet experts anticipate that the company's duties to NASA and its own Starlink expansion plans will use up a large portion of Starship's launch capacity in the first few years of its operational life.

The possibility of SpaceX giving priority to its own missions has been admitted. When outlining its IPO prospectus, the company stated that it “may prioritize our own launch payloads over additional U.S. government contracts or third-party customers”. This is important since it indicates that giving priority to SpaceX's own payloads is not merely an accidental result of limited capacity; it can also be an element of the company's overall business strategy.

SpaceX's competitors are feeling the pressure at a difficult time. Although Blue Origin's New Glenn had been seen as a much-anticipated reusable rocket to challenge the Falcon 9, it was involved in an explosion on the launchpad in May and is expected to stay on the ground at least until the end of the year. As a result, companies in search of alternatives to the Falcon 9 have fewer immediate choices.

United Launch Alliance is also encountering a difficulty; the Vulcan rocket has been halted since February due to a problem with its booster. Since ULA is a joint venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin, it is moreover a major provider of launches for Amazon's low-Earth-orbit satellite network, a network that is becoming a possible competitor to Starlink. Restrictions on alternative launch vehicles could therefore have an impact not just on individual satellite companies but on the wider competition appearing in the satellite internet sector.

Rocket Lab is also a major competitor; it comes second to SpaceX in terms of launch frequency and is currently working on a fully reusable rocket named Neutron. The company is at present acquiring the satellite communications company Iridium for about $8 billion. The significance of Rocket Lab for Iridium's future launch arrangements shows how few alternatives there are. If Rocket Lab had not been available, Iridium would have had to spend billions of dollars on rocket launches in order to get its next-generation satellites into orbit.

Rocket Lab's business model is also very different from that of SpaceX. The company produces components for satellites, such as solar panels, and revenue from this activity started to surpass its launch revenue many years ago. Yet Rocket Lab still has a strong financial interest in keeping the launch market in good shape since it supplies components to customers who eventually need rockets in order to get their spacecraft into orbit. Once those customers are unable to launch their satellites, demand for the components used to build the satellites may eventually decline as well.

The real question therefore isn't merely whether or not SpaceX has enough rockets; it is who is in a position to control access to orbit and in what way that access is distributed as the satellite economy grows. SpaceX has established a strong vertically integrated system allowing it to manufacture satellites, launch them and then operate them within its own network. While this approach gives the company an economic benefit, it also makes it difficult for companies which rely on independent launch providers.

From SpaceX’s point of view, it is reasonable to give priority to Starlink. The satellite internet service brought in $11.4 billion in revenue in 2025 and already accounts for about 60% of the company’s total revenue. It is possible that increasing this business by launching more satellites could yield higher long-term returns than carrying a payload for some other company. The problem is that SpaceX’s commercial decision has effects on hundreds of other companies which rely on access to the same launch facilities.

The situation might one day change if Starship achieves the level of reliability, reusability and launch capacity that had been aimed for. A rocket which is considerably larger and capable of carrying a greater number of satellites at a lower cost would enable SpaceX to expand Starlink while at the same time allowing it to serve a larger number of commercial customers. However, so long as Starship does not become a proven system capable of frequent operation, Falcon 9 will continue to act as a vital link to orbit for a large part of the commercial space sector.

Blue Origin, the United Launch Alliance, Rocket Lab and the other companies providing launch services also have a significant opportunity alongside a tough challenge. Should their competitors manage to raise their launch rates, enhance reusability and provide reliable alternatives, they might win over customers who are now finding it harder to obtain Falcon 9 launch capacity. But if they do not expand quickly enough, satellite firms may come to the realisation that designing a spacecraft is only half the problem; securing a rocket at the right price and at the right time could then turn out to be the more serious issue.

SpaceX's expansion of Starlink is therefore turning into far more than just a matter of a growing satellite internet network; it is increasingly becoming a test of how power, capital, and access to orbit will be distributed in the next stage of the space economy. SpaceX aims to use its rockets to extend its Starlink network, to develop orbital artificial intelligence infrastructure and to assist in major NASA missions, while hundreds of other companies also need those same launch systems in order to get their own investments into space. The result will show whether the future space economy becomes more accessible through cheaper and more frequent launches or whether the limited launch capacity instead brings increasing concentrations of opportunities into the hands of the companies that control the rockets.

Stay informed with the latest national and international news.

© 2026. All rights reserved.

About us

Contact us

Privacy Policy

Disclaimer