Google vs EU: AI Rivals, Android and Search Data Privacy Battle

Google Challenges EU AI and Search Data Orders as Privacy Battle Heats Up

The tech giant Google has taken its latest clash with European regulators to the courts, opposing two European Union orders that would allow rival artificial intelligence services to interface with its Android smartphone operating system and offer eligible search competitors anonymised Google Search data.

Google’s Alphabet-owned parent company filed the legal challenges Monday with the General Court of Luxembourg, which is the EU’s second-highest court. Google says the measures risk undermining Android security, while allowing privacy-enhancing anonymisation of search data is problematic at the level of individual queries.

The European Commission – the bloc’s executive branch, which issued the orders as part of its efforts to enforce the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) – says the measures include privacy, data security and device integrity safeguards.

The Commission initiated binding measures against Google on July 16, 2026. The process began when the EU’s antitrust enforcer opened specification proceedings in January to interpret how Google should implement its existing obligations as a “gatekeeper” company under the DMA.

The two contested orders apply to distinct aspects of the Google business, but the companies’ competition lawyers say they are closely linked by the same fundamental question: does the DMA allow competitors to access services and data controlled and used by Google in a manner that enhances their own products?

One order pertains to artificial intelligence (AI). Under the EU’s interpretation of the DMA, AI services competitive with Google’s Gemini would be entitled to accesses comparable to what Google itself provides to its Gemini technology on Android operating-system features.

The Commission said that prior to the order, competitive AI assistants had been offered limited access to important Android functionalities, while Google’s own assistant could use deeper system accesses to provide users with enhanced AI experiences.

The EU’s final measure applies to 11 Android features that the Commission said were essential for AI assistants, including methods for invoking an assistant, accessing relevant device-based context, performing actions across applications and using certain hardware and software resources.

Several of the changes covered in the AI interoperability order let users invoke third-party AI assistants via supported voice commands and other access methods rather than only the Google-assistant channel. The AI assistants may also operate on information found or created on the device, including certain limited circumstances in which they can understand user context with permission, and perform actions within other applications.

According to the description, this includes composing and sending messages, notes, meetings and other actions which users have authorised to be available to an external AI assistant.

The system design does not provide third-party AI companies with unfettered access to Android users. Rather, each user must explicitly authorize the relevant features for the assistant to use, and the system design should ensure that such interoperability measures apply across the entire Android ecosystem in principle, and without significant technical barriers.

Google is also required to make documentation and support available so that other companies can create products and services compatible with the Android interoperability measures.

The second order relates to Google Search, and involves implications that extend beyond the AI arena. Under Article 6(11) of the DMA, Google is obliged to share anonymised data pertaining to its core search function with eligible third-party search engines on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms.

The Commission opened specification proceedings on January 3, 2026, to interpret how the obligation should apply in practice, with the Commission adopting the final specification measure in July 2026.

The European Commission noted that for decades, Google Search has had more than 90 percent of the European search market, giving it access to vast amounts of information about queries, results and interactions, which it uses to enhance its own search technology, an advantage that competing search services lack.

In applying the new rules, eligible search services may receive information pertaining to queries and rankings from Google, as well as views and clicks that Google collects for the purposes of enhancing its search services. The same system also applies when AI chatbots are used to provide search-engine functionality, which makes the system relevant to both traditional search engines as well as the emerging category of AI-assisted search products.

Crucially, the EU is not compelling Google to share individual users’ accounts or extensive search histories. Instead, the Commission has designed an anonymisation system that is meant to strip away or alter information that could identify individuals, including timestamps, exceptionally long search queries, excessively rare terms, location data and other usage-related information.

The anonymisation system design was informed by privacy expertise, and is meant to be compatible with European data protection requirements. Furthermore, the Commission says, Google is entitled to evaluate whether providing data to any given third party carries cybersecurity or data-protection risks, and the rules are flexible enough to allow adjustments based on ongoing market developments or independent assessments.

Google’s response to the order highlights why the search data and Android interoperability measures remain a sensitive matter for the company.

The tech giant’s senior director of competition, Oliver Bethell, said Google was appealing decisions that would require the company to share private search information and erode important Android security measures simultaneously. The company pointed to the nature of search queries, including issues related to health and relationships, as justification for its concerns about the potential sensitivity of the information.

The European Commission, by contrast, says that the measures are designed with privacy in mind, noting that opening up access to Google data and Android capacities can benefit European consumers’ choice, while still maintaining the appropriate protections for sensitive information.

A spokesperson for the privacy-focused search engine DuckDuckGo said the company supports the European regulator’s position and believes that the anonymisation rules design is strong – but that Google’s appeal will primarily serve to delay the implementation of the measures, rather than to overturn them, a perspective that reflects the company’s position rather than a ruling from the EU court.

The tension has been building for months. On January 27, 2026, the European Commission commenced specification proceedings covering both interoperability measures. The stated intention was not to create entirely new obligations for gatekeeping technology companies under the DMA, but to specify more precise obligations for Google in relation to its existing gatekeeper duties.

The specification measures were formally adopted by the Commission on July 16, 2026. For the Android issue, the measures are designed to let other AI assistant providers access essential capabilities, which Google itself uses for its Gemini technology. As for the Google Search issue, the objective is to enable eligible search competitors to make use of Google’s extensive data resources pertaining to search, subject to the EU’s anonymity and access rules.

At this stage, the timing is of particular interest for the Google-EU competition discussion, as the measures are set to enter into force just as Google mounts its legal challenges. In the case of the search data, practical implementation is due to commence in January 2027, with Android interoperability requirements taking effect later in 2027.

Thus, the court challenge creates a legal confrontation that takes place at the same time as the regulatory deadlines, which will be crucial in determining the practical impact of either outcome.

The potential implications of the outcome in the Google-EU competition dispute are manifold. With regards to the AI interoperability requirement, if the measures proceed as planned, European android users would have more choice in regard to AI assistants, being able to select between various AI providers and benefit from the fact that these assistants will have more access to Android capabilities that Google previously reserved for its own AI technologies.

In the case of the Google Search data, a similar situation would apply – but for search engines rather than AI assistants. Competitors would be able to access an extensive data pool that has been compiled by the EU’s largest search engine, giving them the capacity to analyse how people search, what they search for, what they like and what they do not.

This could significantly benefit traditional search engines as well as AI-assisted search products, as developers would be able to conduct experiments and enhance their algorithms based on their analysis of the data, subject to the EU’s anonymity and access rules.

For Google, however, the matter is not one of mere competition – rather, the concern relates to the potential that regulations in the search and Android space could limit the privacy and security protections that Google provides its users, thus undermining its own products.

Meanwhile, the European Commission has noted that the rules are designed to enable competition while still protecting privacy rights. For now, the EU’s General Court in Luxembourg will serve as the battleground for the dispute.

Stay informed with the latest national and international news.

© 2026. All rights reserved.

About us

Contact us

Privacy Policy

Disclaimer