Facebook Removes Page Targeting ICE Agents After U.S. Justice Department Order | Meta’s Coordinated Harm Policy 2025

Facebook removes a page targeting ICE agents after a U.S. Justice Department request, sparking debate on digital freedom and online safety in 2025.

Raja Awais Ali

10/14/20252 min read

a white and blue square with a blue and white facebook logo
a white and blue square with a blue and white facebook logo

Facebook Removes Page Targeting ICE Agents After U.S. Justice Department Request

Washington, October 14, 2025 — The U.S. Department of Justice confirmed that Meta, the parent company of Facebook, has removed a page accused of targeting and harassing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents by publishing their personal information online.

According to the Justice Department, the page was reportedly operated from Chicago and involved “doxing” — the act of publicly revealing personal details of more than 200 ICE officers, potentially putting their safety at risk.

Attorney General Pam Bondi stated on X (formerly Twitter) that "the page was being used to systematically target federal law enforcement officers, posing a serious threat to their security."

A Meta spokesperson confirmed that the removal was made under its Coordinated Harm Policy, which prohibits users from organizing or engaging in harmful behavior on its platforms. The company emphasized that protecting both public safety and free expression remains its top priority.

This development comes amid ongoing debate over strict immigration measures under President Donald Trump, as ICE operations face renewed scrutiny in major cities including Chicago. The issue continues to fuel discussions about human rights, law enforcement powers, and civil liberties.

Several state and local governments have also expressed opposition to ICE activities. Chicago’s mayor reiterated that federal immigration agents are not permitted to use city property or resources for their operations.

This case once again highlights the complex relationship between technology companies and government agencies. Major platforms like Meta, Google, and X have frequently faced pressure to remove certain content or share user data upon government request — raising questions about where to draw the line between public safety and freedom of expression. Earlier, Apple and Google had also removed apps accused of tracking ICE personnel amid government concerns.

While Facebook has already taken down the page, the Justice Department has not yet confirmed whether legal action will follow against those responsible for running it.

Conclusion

Facebook’s decision underscores the growing tension between government regulation and digital freedom. On one hand, it reinforces the importance of removing harmful content; on the other, it raises concerns about online censorship and the boundaries of free speech.
Experts believe such decisions will continue shaping the global debate over responsibility, transparency, and accountability in the digital era.